Acid-Base Physiology - Examples for 9.6
Case History  17 : An Intoxicated Baby

Clinical Details
An 8 month old female baby was admitted with a one day history of lethargy. She had vomited several times. Her mother said she appeared "intoxicated". Examination confirmed the obtunded mental state but she was easily rousable and muscle tone was normal. Resp rate was 60/min. Pupils were normal. There was no evidence of dehydration. Abdomen was soft and nontender. BP was 112/62. Peripheral perfusion was clinically assessed as normal. Heart and chest examination was normal. Plantar response was normal.

Investigations: Na+ 135, K+ 4.2, Cl- 116, bicarbonate 5.7, glucose 5.9 (All in mmol/l). Other results: Urine: pH 5.0, negative for glucose and ketones. Numerous calcium oxalate crystals were seen on urine microscopy [This example is Case 2 reported by Saladino & Shannon]

Arterial Blood Gases

pH 

7.19  

pCO2 mmHg

16 mmHg

pO2  mmHg

110 mmHg

HCO3  mmol/l

6.2 mmol/l

Assessment
Firstly, initial clinical assessment:

The alerting information in the history is the comment about the baby appearing "intoxicated": such a CNS sign suggests a toxin such as ethylene glycol or methanol as the cause. However, an ill baby is typically listness and one should not read to much into this comment. The finding of numerous calcium oxalate crystals strongly suggests ethylene glycol toxicity and as this is such a serious diagnosis, it should be aggressively pursued.

There is no evidence of hypoperfusion, hyperglycaemia or ketosis. Also there is no history given of any inherited metabolic disorder which could result in a lactic acidosis or a renal tubular acidosis but these are possibilities. The amount of vomiting will not result in alkalosis and the baby is too old for infantile pyloric stenosis. Unfortunately, no urea or creatinine result is provided. 

Secondly, the acid-base diagnosis:  
1. pH:
 The severe acidaemia indicates a severe acidosis is present.
2. Pattern: The pattern of a low bicarbonate & low pCO
2 indicates that this is a metabolic acidosis. 
3. Clues: The anion gap is normal (ie 135-116-5.7 = 13.3mmol/l) and the chloride is raised. This indicates a normal anion gap acidosis. 
4. Compensation:  The expected pCO2 is (1.5 x 6.2 + 8) = 17.3mmHg. The actual pCO2 is close so respiratory compensation is maximal. It takes 12 to 24 hours for compensation to reach this maximal level & the history indicates sufficient time has passed.
5. Formulation:
A normal anion gap metabolic acidosis with maximal respiratory compensation. This is typically due to either GIT causes (eg diarrhoea) or a renal cause (renal tubular acidosis). There is no history supporting a GIT cause. The urine pH is 5 which is appropriately low and does not support a diagnosis of type 1 (or distal) renal tubular acidosis. The absence of hypokalaemia & the severity of the acidosis are also against the diagnosis of a type 2 renal tubular acidosis.  
6. Confirmation: 

Finally, the Clinical Diagnosis:
A severe acidaemia is present. This in association with a low HCO3 with a low pCO2 confirm a metabolic acidosis.

Is the fall in pCO2 appropriate?

Rule 5 can be used to predict the appropriate amount of respiratory compensation. Sufficient time has elapsed to reach maximal compensation.

Expected pCO2 = (1.5 x 6.2) + 8 (+/- 2) = 17.3 (and range about 15 to 19).

The actual pCO2 falls within the expected range. There is no evidence of a co-existent respiratory acid-base disorder.

What is the cause of the metabolic acidosis?

Anion gap = 135 - (116 + 5.7) = 13.3

Delta ratio = Increase in AG / decrease in HCO3 = (13.3-12)/(24-6) = 0.07

A normal anion gap (or hyperchloraemic) metabolic acidosis is present. The D/D ratio close to zero suggests a ‘pure’ hyperchloraemic acidosis without any evidence of a co-existent high anion gap acidosis.

A hyperchloraemic acidosis results from loss of base from either the gut or the kidney (or rarely from gain of HCl from some infusions eg NH4Cl).

As the urine pH is appropriately low, a distal renal tubular acidosis is not likely. There is no history of drug (eg acetazolamide) or toxin ingestion. There is no ketoacidosis. There have been no intravenous infusions. There has been no diarrhoea and no other evidence of loss of intestinal secretions.

So far the cause of the acidosis is not clear. None of the causes of a hyperchloraemic acidosis have been found. Also the predominant sign in the history (lethargy or ‘intoxication’) has not been explained.

This patient was worked up looking for an inherited defect. This included analysis of plasma amino acids which showed a high glycine level. A large glycolic acid peak was found when a chromatographic analysis of serum (searching for organic acids) was carried out. This strongly points to ethylene glycol ingestion as the diagnosis. Ethylene glycol inself is nontoxic but it is converted in the liver to toxic metabolites such as glycolic acid which is responsible for the acidosis. The distinctive calcium oxalate crystals were found in the urine and this further supports the diagnosis.

Ethylene glycol ingestion causes a high anion gap acidosis so the predominantly hyperchloraemic acidosis in this case is unexplained. Oddly, the article did not comment on this feature despite a hyperchloraemic acidosis being present in both cases reported in the article. An elevated anion gap is not always found in reported cases of ethylene glycol toxicity. (Eder et al 1998)

 

 

Last updated Wednesday, 20 April 2005 03:30 PM  - All material © Copyright - Kerry Brandis, 2001

Hit Counter